Submit | All submissions | Best solutions | Back to list |
PALIN - The Next Palindrome |
A positive integer is called a palindrome if its representation in the decimal system is the same when read from left to right and from right to left. For a given positive integer K of not more than 1000000 digits, write the value of the smallest palindrome larger than K to output. Numbers are always displayed without leading zeros.
Input
The first line contains integer t, the number of test cases. Integers K are given in the next t lines.
Output
For each K, output the smallest palindrome larger than K.
Example
Input: 2 808 2133 Output: 818 2222
Warning: large Input/Output data, be careful with certain languages
Added by: | adrian |
Date: | 2004-05-01 |
Time limit: | 2s-9s |
Source limit: | 50000B |
Memory limit: | 1536MB |
Cluster: | Cube (Intel G860) |
Languages: | All except: NODEJS PERL6 |
hide comments
|
||||||||||||||
2017-11-19 21:30:23 dsr
Why am I getting NZEC for python :'( |
||||||||||||||
2017-11-18 17:52:17
in my ide, i get the correct answer against every possible test case, but here, why does it show wrong answer? |
||||||||||||||
2017-11-08 20:51:02
My code exceeded the time limit. Does that imply there would be any redundancy in my code ? |
||||||||||||||
2017-10-31 14:57:27
use string not integer, refer to geeks for geeks article for next palindrome, don't forget to include case 0000000 and 000000xxxx where xxx can be any number. goodluck :) |
||||||||||||||
2017-10-30 14:22:55
there are no cases like 001 .. so dont worry.. i've submitted without even checking them |
||||||||||||||
2017-10-26 17:18:03
a small mistake can waste your 3 hours ;-| every thing is mentioned in this question and end line is important |
||||||||||||||
2017-10-26 07:29:50
Why is it showing compilation error? When I run the same code on my computer, it works perfectly. |
||||||||||||||
2017-10-19 15:41:48
Theoden's test cases are recommended, plus "23726 -> 23732" (this case took me a lot of time to figure out) |
||||||||||||||
2017-10-07 15:24:44
000 gives 010 as output...huh..this is bad |
||||||||||||||
2017-10-05 14:15:12
Remember to check 0/000002133000/9/ |