Submit | All submissions | Best solutions | Back to list |
TRANCLS - Transitive Closure |
In mathematics, a set S is transitive if whenever an element a is related to an element b, and b is in turn related to an element c, then a is also related to c. In other words, any set of pairs is transitive if and only if you have (a,b) and (b,c) then you also must have (a,c). Check this example: S = { (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (2,4) }. Is set S is transitive relation ? No, Because you have (1,2) and (2,3) but you don’t have (1,3) If we add (1,3) will it be transitive ? ((S = { (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (2,4), (1,3) } )) No, Because you have (1,3) and (3,4) but you don’t have (1,4) If we add (1,4) will it be transitive ? ((S = { (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (2,4), (1,3), (1,4) } )) Yes, Now the set S is now transitive after we added 2 pairs { (1,3), (1,4) } These pairs called transitive closure (which means the minimal pairs that convert set S into a transitive set). Your task is given the set S you have to output the minimal pairs have to be added to make the set S transitive.
Input
The first line of input is the number of test cases T where (0 < T <= 100), Each test case you'll be given the number of pairs in the set N where (0 < N <= 100), followed by N pairs (a, b) where (0 <= a,b < N).
Output
For each test case print "Case_#i:_X" where "i" is the case number, "X" is the minimal number of pairs have to be added to make the set transitive and "_" is a white space. Each test case should be in a separate line.
Example
Input: 3 4 0 1 1 2 2 3 1 3 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 Output: Case #1: 2 Case #2: 2 Case #3: 0
Added by: | Sharaf |
Date: | 2013-02-07 |
Time limit: | 1s |
Source limit: | 50000B |
Memory limit: | 1536MB |
Cluster: | Cube (Intel G860) |
Languages: | All |
Resource: | 2013 acmASCIS Level 1 Contest |
hide comments
|
|||||
2015-06-22 15:44:29 Pratik Nagelia
Beware. Same input pairs can appear multiple times. |
|||||
2015-04-17 21:40:33 Mayank Ladia
Any tricky case pls.. http://www.spoj.com/status/ns=14111405 Why am getting wrong ? |
|||||
2014-10-10 07:31:17 humble_coder
I dont understand why I am getting wrong answer.. Isn't this just an easy implementation of floyd warshall with O(n^2) space but getting WA.. |
|||||
2014-06-13 12:29:03 you_know_why
nice....... |
|||||
2013-06-27 17:51:33 Kevin Sebastian
pls tell me where i am wrong submission id 9563433 |
|||||
2013-06-08 19:02:00 vishal chaudhary
very nice problem..costed me 2 WA due to a silly mistake..:P Last edit: 2013-06-08 19:03:07 |
|||||
2013-06-07 16:39:25 Ouditchya Sinha
Finally AC! Quite an easy one. :) |
|||||
2013-05-08 07:28:54 Vipul Pandey
easy! |
|||||
2013-05-07 09:59:19 arijit pande
Made plenty of stupid mistakes, but finally AC. :-) |
|||||
2013-03-11 17:29:51 Man Mohan Mishra
awesome problem !! |