Submit | All submissions | Best solutions | Back to list |
MCUR98 - Self Numbers |
Background
In 1949 the Indian mathematician D.R. Kaprekar discovered a class of numbers called self-numbers. For any positive integer n, define d(n) to ben plus the sum of the digits of n. (The d stands for digitadition, a term coined by Kaprekar.) For example:
d(75) = 75 + 7 + 5 = 87
Given any positive integer n as a starting point, you can construct the infinite increasing sequence of integers n, d(n), d(d(n)), d(d(d(n))), ... For example, if you start with 33, the next number is 33 + 3 + 3 = 39, the next is 39 + 3 + 9 = 51, the next is 51 + 5 + 1 = 57, and so you generate the sequence
33, 39, 51, 57, 69, 84, 96, 111, 114, 120, 123, 129, 141, ...
The number n is called a generator of d(n). In the sequence above, 33 is a generator of 39, 39 is a generator of 51, 51 is a generator of 57, and so on.
Some numbers have more than one generator: For example, 101 has two generators, 91 and 100. A number with no generators is a self-number. There are thirteen self-numbers less than 100: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 20, 31, 42, 53, 64, 75, 86, and 97.
Problem
Write a program to output all positive self-numbers less than 1000000 in increasing order, one per line.
Input
There is no input.
Output
All positive self-numbers less than 1000000 in increasing order, one per line.
Added by: | abdelkarim |
Date: | 2013-09-15 |
Time limit: | 0.400s |
Source limit: | 900B |
Memory limit: | 1536MB |
Cluster: | Cube (Intel G860) |
Languages: | All except: ASM64 |
Resource: | Mid-Central USA 1998 |
hide comments
|
||||||
2013-10-27 07:31:38 Prakhar Gupta
@abdelkarim, pls check my sol 10357831, i dont know why i m getting WA |
||||||
2013-09-15 15:24:50 Ouditchya Sinha
There is a case which one can tend to overlook!! Too easy though. ;) :) |
||||||
2013-09-15 08:09:57 numerix
@Arman Singh: Source limitation is self-explaning for that kind of problem. |
||||||
2013-09-15 07:12:46 mystique_blue
After this People may try HARSHAD. |
||||||
2013-09-15 07:12:09 mystique_blue
Its not challenge type then why the limit on size? @numerix : iwas saying that the limit could hhave been..say..5000, no one will be able to put the answer (what you meant by self explaining) in those many chars ;) Last edit: 2013-09-15 14:50:04 |