Submit | All submissions | Best solutions | Back to list |
SUMFOUR - 4 values whose sum is 0 |
The SUM problem can be formulated as follows: given four lists A, B, C, D of integer values, compute how many quadruplet (a, b, c, d ) belongs to A x B x C x D are such that a + b + c + d = 0. In the following, assume that all lists have the same size n.
Input
The first line of the input file contains the size of the lists n (this value can be as large as 4000). We then have n lines containing four integer values (with absolute value as large as 228 ) that belong respectively to A, B, C and D.
(Edited: n <= 2500)
Output
Output should be printed on a single line.
Example
Input: 6 -45 22 42 -16 -41 -27 56 30 -36 53 -37 77 -36 30 -75 -46 26 -38 -10 62 -32 -54 -6 45 Output: 5
Added by: | Abhilash I |
Date: | 2007-02-06 |
Time limit: | 1.419s |
Source limit: | 50000B |
Memory limit: | 1536MB |
Cluster: | Cube (Intel G860) |
Languages: | All except: ERL JS-RHINO NODEJS PERL6 VB.NET |
Resource: | South western 05-06 |
hide comments
|
||||||||||||||
2017-06-18 14:12:45
Using map or unordered_map didn't work for me even after the prevailing "reserved" keyword.After having tried many approaches I come to know, this problem asks to use binary search either simply or through "equal range", I think this approach would be a finer one. |
||||||||||||||
2017-06-07 11:55:21
Same question as @up79, TLE without reserve(), when using unordered_map BTW, 2.33 secs using upper_bound/lower_bound & 2.84 secs using unordered_map Last edit: 2017-06-07 15:57:34 |
||||||||||||||
2017-05-24 10:47:06
sas1905 pro /\ |
||||||||||||||
2017-05-23 16:00:22
TLE with bounds ..AC with equal_range |
||||||||||||||
2017-04-18 00:39:58
You can do it in 0.08s by using Feynman's algorithm. |
||||||||||||||
2017-04-18 00:02:30
TLE with lower bound and upper bound. A/C with equal_range and unordered_map + reserve! |
||||||||||||||
2017-03-24 21:57:49
simple sorting and equal_range ...AC in one go |
||||||||||||||
2017-03-18 17:22:59
its just simple.... just upper_bound and lower_bound thats it! AC in second go ;) |
||||||||||||||
2017-03-10 06:22:55
Last edit: 2017-04-24 23:33:14 |
||||||||||||||
2017-03-09 16:33:58
use equal_range, if you get TLE with lower and upper bound! |